• +44-190-022-0819 +44-190-022-0819
  • +1-248-268-9041 +1-248-268-9041
  • +61288800241 +61288800241

SEARCH SOLUTION

Search your solution from list of 1000+ questions

13-07-2018

Product code: Finance-QA76

TASK DESCRIPTION :Assignment ONE

TASKS

Using a company listed on the London Stock Exchange that is agreed with your Lecturer:

  1. Analyse critically the changes in financial performance (both strategic and operational) over the last five years. Relate these changes to the following areas:
  • Liquidity,
  • Profitability
  • Working capital management
  • Capital structure management
  • Stock market performance.
  1. Explain any problems or limitations of your analysis.
  2. Make recommendations for any improvements to the areas listed in (1) above

Please note: it is your responsibility to check with your tutor if you are unclear about the chosen company.

FORMATTING AND LAYOUT

  1. Writing: Written in English in an appropriate business/academic style
  2. Focus: Focus only on the tasks set in the assignment.
  3. Length: 3000 words
  4. Formatting: Typed on A4 paper in Times New Roman or Arial font 12 with at least 2.5 centimetre space at each edge, double spaced and pages numbered.
  5. Document format: Report
  6. Ensure a clear title, course, and name or ID number is on a cover sheet and a bibliography using Harvard referencing throughout is also provided.
  7. Research: Research should use reliable and relevant sources of information e.g. academic books and journals that have been peer reviewed. The research should be extensive.

 

The use of a range of information sources is expected – academic books, peer reviewed journal articles, professional articles, press releases and newspaper articles, reliable statistics, company annual reports and other company information. All referencing should be in Harvard style.

marking criteria and Student FEEDBACK – Assignment One

This section details the assessment criteria. The extent to which these are demonstrated by you determines your mark. The marks available for each criterion are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement.

TASK DESCRIPTION: Assignment TWO

TASKS

Long term finance may be generated internally or externally by companies.

 

Required:

 

1) Critically evaluate five different sources of external finance that are available to a public listed company. Identify and explain what considerations may be taken into account by the Board of Directors when choosing the type of financing to use.

 

2) Explain the term weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Critically evaluate the view that the WACC is affected by the long-term sources of finance employed by a listed company.

FORMATTING AND LAYOUT

Please note the following when completing your written assignment:

  1. Writing: Written in English in an appropriate business/academic style
  2. Focus: Focus only on the tasks set in the assignment.
  3. Length:3000 words
  4. Formatting: Typed on A4 paper in Times New Roman or Arial font 12 with at least 2.5 centimetre space at each edge, double spaced and pages numbered.
  5. Document format:Report
  6. Ensure a clear title, course, and name or ID number is on a cover sheet and a bibliography using Harvard referencing throughout is also provided.
  7. Research: Research should use reliable and relevant sources of information e.g. academic books and journals that have been peer reviewed. The research should be extensive.

The use of a range of information sources is expected – academic books, peer reviewed journal articles, professional articles, press releases and newspaper articles, reliable statistics, company annual reports and other company information.All referencing should be in Harvard style.

marking criteria and Student FEEDBACK – Assignment 2 Two

This section details the assessment criteria. The extent to which these are demonstrated by you determines your mark. The marks available for each criterion are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement.

GUIDANCE FOR Students IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS

 

NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five common assessment criteria overleaf and specifically aligned to the “exceptional” outcome category to which we anticipate students aspire

  1. Research-informed Literature
  2. Your work must embed and be informed and supported by relevant and credible scholarly material that is accessible in the learned journals listed on the module schedule.  You should refer to at least 10 such sources.  Additionally, you should refer to text books, current news items and benchmark your organisation against other organisations to ensure your assignment is current and up-to-date.  High-level referencing skills using the Harvard Method must be demonstrated throughout your work and all sources listed alphabetically within your bibliography. 
  3. Knowledge and Understanding of Subject
  4. Your work must demonstrate the growing extent of your knowledge and understanding of concepts and underlying principles associated with the subject area.  This means that within your work, you should provide evidence of your growing mastery in critical awareness of current challenges, new insights and the constant need for innovation within the field.  Furthermore, a critical awareness of the ambiguities and limitations of knowledge and even understanding, should be considered and examples of such, illustrated within your work. 
  5. Analysis
  6. To be considered masters worthy, your work must contain evidence of analysis, evaluation and synthesis.  This means not just describing “What!” but also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? And at what cost!  At all times, you must provide justification of your arguments and judgements.  Evidence that you have reflected upon the ideas of others on matters occurring in the real world of business is crucial to you providing a reasoned and informed debate within your work.  Your choice of methodologies to gather data and information must be rigorously defended.  Furthermore, you should provide evidence that you are able to make sound judgements and convincing arguments in the absence of complete data, since within the real world of work, we rarely have access to, or know all the information!  Persuasive conclusions are especially necessary and must be derived from the content of your work – there should be no new information presented within your conclusion.  Your work should aspire to resemble work which is of journal publishable quality.
  7. Practical Application and Deployment

It is essential that you rationalise how you decided upon certain methods, materials, tools and techniques to inform and complete your work.  You must demonstrate what informed your decision(s) to apply certain concepts that enabled you to formulate innovative and creative solutions to the challenges presented to you or that you identified for yourself.  Plausible, costed and justifiable recommendations are demanded and where these are absent, your work is undermined.  Your work should provide evidence that you are growing in mastery in developing cutting edge processes and techniques within the subject area.

Skills for Professional Practice

Your work must provide evidence of your attributes in the application of professional practice.  This includes demonstrating that you are highly capable of individual and collaborative working.  Regarding the presentation of your work, you must demonstrate your ability to select and deploy the appropriate media that is “fit for purpose. Additionally, you must exhibit your ability to: communicate with an exceptionally high level of professionalism; work professionally, autonomously and within a team; develop leadership skills; and produce/present work that is coherent, cogent and specifically addresses the challenges set for you or you have set yourself. Importantly, your work should be easily understood by specialists and non-specialists in the field. 

 

 

Download Questions

With this report we will be trying to analyse and evaluate the apparel industry and one of the highly focussed apparel company - the Ted Baker plc. The evaluation will be done by looking into the company’s financial performance in the last five years. For this evaluation we collected the company’s different financial ratios from the “Financial Morningstar.com” and tried to analyse and interpret it

Related Questions in (Finance)

19-01-2018

Solution: Residual earnings valuation method is used to calculate the intrinsic value of the stock based on the expected residual income of the company in the coming years. The residual income is discounted bac ...

13-07-2019

Solution: Question 1: Key Value Drivers (20 marks) You are analysing Freefly Corp’s growth and market value. You have collected the company’s financial data shown below. Freefly Corp. Financial Statement ...

15-07-2019

Solution: A. You have just won the Strayer Lottery jackpot of $11,000,000. You will be paid in 26 equal annual installments beginning immediately. If you had the money now, you could invest it in an account wit ...

13-07-2018

Solution: 1. A) H0: Mean performance grades across locations are equal H1: Mean performance grades across locations are not equal ...

14-07-2018

Solution: Service Blueprint is based on process, points of contact and evidences. On the basis of service blueprint, one can evaluate the front stage and backstage employee reaction. As stated by Rossiter and S ...

24-07-2018

Solution: The project will discuss about the factors and risk that are considered as the elements that affect a project work. Projects are dependent on various factors like funding, raw materials and labors whi ...

24-07-2018

Solution: 1. I have selected 5 listed firms of U.S. and NASDAQ as the stock index. The 5 listed firms are Colgate Palmolive, P&G, Target, Walmart, &Apple. The returns of the selected firms and NASDAQ has been c ...

25-07-2018

Solution: The risk management analysis will be done by analyzing current risk plan of Young’s couple and accordingly suggest new plan if it suits their conditions. The detailed analysis for different risk met ...